It is obvious that Rodrigues, although the President of the Canadian Association of Journalist, has failed to remember his code of journalistic ethics; to remain unbiased, present evidence and conduct investigation on the matter at hand. Had he done so, not only would he have exposed the forensic evidence discovered, which speaks for itself, but also the fact that Church and State have been covering up the Canadian Genocide, and that this is not just in Canada, but rather an organized crime scheme implemented worldwide (www.jh.to/organizedcrime)
(BELOW AN OPEN LETTER TO HUGO RODRIGUES AND THE BRANTFORD EXPOSITOR)
December 16, 2011 Volume 2, Issue#20
Just What Is Being Exposited Here?
Dear Mr. Rodrigues:
I acknowledge that the Brantford Expositor isn't the Washington Post or
the Manchester Guardian, or even Der Spiegel, but just what planet are you and
your editorial staff professing to exposit?
You recently fired off an exposition entitled “Sensationalism at its
greatest,” rejecting the recent efforts of the Mohawk Elders and clan mothers,
together with Kevin Annett and the International Tribunal Into The Crimes of
Church and State (ITCCS), to conduct a forensic examination into a suspected
mass grave site (one of at least 28 documented to exist across Canada).
In doing so, you extolled the virtues of Chief Bill Monture and the “Mohawk
Tribal Council,” as the ultimate fount of all knowledge, Mohawk-wise, final
authority and critic of what is going on.
First of all, let's clarify the chain of command – and credibility – here.
You refer to “elected” band council, which has a ring of authority, all right.
You must know, living in
Brantford, that “elected” is
a white man's word, and whenever it's pinned to chief or a council, it's the
tip off that these boys are marching not to Mohawk drums but to the Ottawa
variety: they're payroll Indians, and they're answerable not to their people
but to John Duncan, the Department of Aboriginal Affairs, Stephen Harper and
the federal government. So much for your expert witnesses.
Your next observation is that “Members of the Mohawk Nation” invited
Kevin Annett to the site “and are
behind claims that the remains found belong to former residents at the school.”
Before dissing all of that, you refer to Kevin Annett as a former
Anglican Priest. Wow. Even at his worst, when he strove unsuccessfully to
square his Christian upbringing and his Master of Divinity degree with the
criminal shenanigans of the United Church of Canada (Indian land sales to
MacMillan Bloedel, the incarceration, torture, sodomy, rape and murder of 50%
of their students, rather than graduating them cum laude), he
would have been insulted by being described as a minion of that neutered,
pseudo-Catholic religion that owes its existence to a fat, horny 17th Century
English monarch who wanted multiple annulments that pious Rome would not grant.
Anyway, you're right in your use of the word “former.” The UCC threw him
out in 1995 because he insisted on the truth, and he has the lumps (17 years
worth) to prove it. Loss of his livelihood, harassment, including physical
assault, and treated like a pariah in his own country by the establishment, the
government, the RCMP and the media – much bigger, better and more powerful than
the Brantford Expositor, so you're in good company.
By your definition, Kevin is “an activist.” You should have called him an
“occupier.” That, with Wall Street implications, would have completed his
castigation.
Now let's deal with the matter of “reputable archaeological processes,”
as defined by those two experts, Bill Monture and Hugo Rodrigues. By now
you may have discerned that Kevin is my son, so you can immediately discount
everything I say as nepotism of the worst kind. However, in my lurid past I
once served as President of the Manitoba Archaeological Society. On many
occasions, while still a teen-age boy, Kevin participated in professional digs
carried out by that Society. There is no one in this whole altercation better able
than Kevin to understand the importance of the professional integrity of a
forensic archaeological examination, and the simple fact that once excavated, a
site is virtually destroyed. (This, in fact, has prompted the government and
the churches and the RCMP on more than one occasion to do just that. If I'm
wrong, I invite you - and them - to sue me.)
The Mohawk Elders, supported by the clan mothers, with the cooperation of
the ITCCS, conducted GPR (ground penetrating radar) operations with the use of
machines that approximate the technology used in the extractive industries,
known as aerial magnetometer surveys. On the basis of those findings, they
excavated. (It's significant to point out that for some time, at taxpayer
expense, Bill Monture and his “elected” payroll Indians have been in possession
of such expensive equipment and have done squat. Nada. Zip. I wonder why?)
The
findings of the Elders, i.e. specimens of bones, clothing, buttons, shoes and
residues of coal (as in “furnace,” the normal repository of dead children,
according to generations of witnesses documented over 20 years, the subject not
only of three books, an award-winning film and Government reports dated since
1907). The bone fragments have recently been authenticated and
confirmed by a professional archaeologist.
Hugo, what really cracked me up was your closing attribution to Bill
Monture of the final summation: “You can't just dig a hole and say you've found
some stuff," Montour said in a phone interview. No kidding. Then:
"There are rules in Ontario for archeological digs... that's how it should
have been done. If they found bones or fragments, then maybe the coroner should
have been contacted."
The coroner. Of course. Government employee. Just like Bill Monture, the
tribal council, the RCMP and all the ships at sea. The government will get it
right, like they have for 150 years. The Mohawk elders know better. This is
sovereign land, and they've served notice that the payroll Indians, the
government, the Crown and the Vatican are to stay out of this. This is one case
where the foxes will not be trusted to guard the henhouse.
But that isn't the item, Hugo. Note what Bill Monture said: "Just
digging a hole is a grave disrespect for those human remains..."
Three hundred other nations in Turtle Island who have attended 500 former
rez schools, take note. In 141 of those cases, according to the Canadian
government's own records, 50% of all the 150,000 kids who were incarcerated
never graduated cum laude, or returned home, or were ever seen
again. Gee, I wonder where they went?
Well, given all that lovely Catholic, Anglican and United Christian
teaching, perhaps they just rose bodily into Canadian Heaven. Surely the Pope
could have arranged that, if not the Anglican Primate or Mardi Tindall, the UCC
Moderator.
Otherwise, why don't we stop nit-picking about who's authentic, the Mohawk
people or John Duncan, who has admitted he can't stomach salmon hash or fry
bread?
Monture is admitting what the Mohawk elders have proven. There are human
remains, requiring only to measure up to Bill Monture's exacting standards.
Do you get it, Hugo?
Habeas corpus and all that,
William Annett
Read more...
