US and Vatican Attempting to Censor Internet

Right now, a law is being debated in the US Congress. Under this new law, the US would force Internet providers to block any website on suspicion of violating copyright or trademark legislation, or even failing to sufficiently police their users' activities. The Vatican is heavily backing the new law that would allow them to control information they wouldn't want the world to know. To sign petition: http://jh.to/uncensored Photobucket

Priest Sex Abuse:New suit alleges more abuse by accused priest

Monday, December 21, 2009

Link
05/06/09

A 37-year-old Nebraska man filed a lawsuit today against a Chicago priest, alleging the priest sexually abused him when he was a teenager.

Tim Waters of Omaha, Neb., said at an afternoon news conference that Rev. Robert Stepek fondled him in the driveway of his family's South Side home in 1987 when he was 16.

Waters and his family were parishioners at St. Christina Parish, 11005 S. Homan Ave., and knew Stepek when he served as associate pastor between 1983 and 1991. Stepek later did the wedding ceremony for Waters and his wife.

Memories of the alleged abuse surfaced, Waters said, after he suffered a mental breakdown in November. He said he chose to use his name in the lawsuit, rather than file it anonymously, to encourage victims of abuse to come forward.

"I'm saving someone else," he said. "I'm not ashamed."

Stepek last served at St. Albert the Great Church in Burbank and was removed from the ministry in November 2006 after the Chicago Archdiocese found evidence of sexual misconduct against him involving two brothers in the early 1980s, when he served at St. Symphorosa parish on the Southwest Side.

Stepek later filed a $4 million defamation suit against the two accusers, arguing the allegations were false and the accusations were the result of slights he committed against them.

The accusers later sued Stepek and the archdiocese.

Read more...

Catholic Church Clergy Accused: Church Sex Abuse Trial Starting in Seattle

Link
05/06/09

Jury selection is expected to start Wednesday in the area's first clergy sexual-abuse trial involving the Seattle Roman Catholic Archdiocese - one of only a handful of such trials nationwide since the Catholic Church sex-abuse scandal broke in 2002.

The trial, to be held in King County Superior Court, involves Patrick

O'Donnell, a former priest in the Spokane Diocese who served at Seattle's St. Paul Church from 1976 to 1978.

O'Donnell was removed from ministry in the mid-1980s and has admitted to molesting at least 30 boys.

The trial involves two of four men who, in a 2005 lawsuit, accused Seattle Archdiocese leaders of failing to protect them from O'Donnell during the time he was a priest at St. Paul's.

O'Donnell had been sent by the Spokane bishop to Seattle in 1976 for sexual-deviancy treatment after an allegation arose in Spokane.

While in Seattle, O'Donnell also earned a doctorate in psychology from the University of Washington.

In recent years, he practiced psychology in Bellevue, treating patients 12 and older until 2002, when the state began investigating allegations of his past abuse of minors. He surrendered his state psychology license in 2004.

O'Donnell has been named in numerous lawsuits and has been accused of molesting altar boys, students and Boy Scouts.

Claims against him played a large part in the Spokane Diocese's bankruptcy filing in 2004. O'Donnell was named in 66 of the 176 bankruptcy-court claims alleging sexual abuse by priests in the diocese, more than any other single priest.

Victims have accused Spokane Bishop William Skylstad, former president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, of failing to prevent O'Donnell from molesting children, even after they complained repeatedly. Skylstad supervised O'Donnell years ago.

The plaintiffs in the Seattle case say — and at least one Spokane Diocese leader has contended — that the Seattle Archdiocese was informed of O'Donnell's history when he was sent to Seattle in the 1970s.

Seattle Archdiocese leaders say otherwise. Former Seattle Archbishop Raymond Hunthausen "has repeatedly and emphatically stated that he had no knowledge of past abuse by Patrick O'Donnell," said Seattle Archdiocese spokesman Greg Magnoni.

The other two plaintiffs in the 2005 lawsuit have settled.

Seattle Archdiocese officials said they have made what they believe to be reasonable offers to the remaining two plaintiffs, and they are still hoping to settle with them. All four of the Seattle plaintiffs have reached settlements with the Spokane Diocese involving the same abuse.

Plaintiffs' attorney Timothy Kosnoff said, "We believe the issues that will be addressed at trial are of paramount concern to the community because they involve the protection of children from sexual abuse."

Read more...

Clergy Sex Abuse: Seattle: Trial Involving Notorious Abusive Priest Begins

link
05/05/09

Jury selection will soon begin in a lawsuit against the Archdiocese of Seattle, which is accused of failing to supervise Father Patrick O’Donnell, who has admitted molesting 30 boys. The priest, who later practiced psychology, reportedly wrote a thesis entitled, “A Prisoner’s Dilemma: Evoking Trust Between Children and Adults.” According to BishopAccountability.org’s database of publicly accused priests:

Removed 1985. Abused as many as 65 boys in mid 1970s and early 1980s in Spokane & Seattle. After leaving active priesthood, he worked as a psychologist for teens & adults at a clinic in Bellevue. Sanctioned in 1984 for abuse when he was a priest. Sanctions lifted 1986. License permanently suspended 1/04. At least 2 victims committed suicide. Trained by the Sulpicians. Named in new suit filed 2/08 by 3. Admitted guilt and settled 11/08 for $5M which he can’t pay.


Read more...

Clergy Sex Abuse: Jury Selection to Begin Wednesday in Seattle Archdiocese Sex-Abuse Trial

Link
05/05/09


Jury selection is expected to start Wednesday in the area's first clergy sexual-abuse trial involving the Seattle Roman Catholic Archdiocese — one of only a handful of such trials nationwide since the Catholic Church sex-abuse scandal broke in 2002.

The trial, to be held in King County Superior Court, involves Patrick O'Donnell, a former priest in the Spokane Diocese who served at Seattle's St. Paul Church from 1976 to 1978.

O'Donnell was removed from ministry in the mid-1980s and has admitted to molesting at least 30 boys.

The trial involves two of four men who, in a 2005 lawsuit, accused Seattle Archdiocese leaders of failing to protect them from O'Donnell during the time he was a priest at St. Paul's.

O'Donnell had been sent by the Spokane bishop to Seattle in 1976 for sexual-deviancy treatment after an allegation arose in Spokane.

While in Seattle, O'Donnell also earned a doctorate in psychology from the University of Washington. In recent years, he practiced psychology in Bellevue, treating patients 12 and older until 2002, when the state began investigating allegations of his past abuse of minors. He surrendered his state psychology license in 2004.

O'Donnell has been named in numerous lawsuits and has been accused of molesting altar boys, students and Boy Scouts.

Claims against him played a large part in the Spokane Diocese's bankruptcy filing in 2004. O'Donnell was named in 66 of the 176 bankruptcy-court claims alleging sexual abuse by priests in the diocese, more than any other single priest. Victims have accused Spokane Bishop William Skylstad, former president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, of failing to prevent O'Donnell from molesting children, even after they complained repeatedly. Skylstad supervised O'Donnell years ago.

The plaintiffs in the Seattle case say — and at least one Spokane Diocese leader has contended — that the Seattle Archdiocese was informed of O'Donnell's history when he was sent to Seattle in the 1970s.

Seattle Archdiocese leaders say otherwise. Former Seattle Archbishop Raymond Hunthausen "has repeatedly and emphatically stated that he had no knowledge of past abuse by Patrick O'Donnell," said Seattle Archdiocese spokesman Greg Magnoni.

The other two plaintiffs in the 2005 lawsuit have settled.

Seattle Archdiocese officials said they have made what they believe to be reasonable offers to the remaining two plaintiffs, and they are still hoping to settle with them. All four of the Seattle plaintiffs have reached settlements with the Spokane Diocese involving the same abuse.

Plaintiffs' attorney Timothy Kosnoff said, "We believe the issues that will be addressed at trial are of paramount concern to the community because they involve the protection of children from sexual abuse."

Read more...

Pedophile Priest: Bail for Priest on Sex Abuse Charges

Link
05/05/09

Sixth man charged: St Stanislaus College in Bathurst. (ABC News)

A Queensland priest accused of sexually assaulting a student at a Bathurst boarding school almost 20 years ago has appeared in a Sydney court.

Kevin Phillips, 58, from Mackay in north Queensland, walked into Surry Hills police station in Sydney yesterday to be questioned about abuse at St Stanislaus boarding school, where he worked in 1990.

He has been charged with attempting homosexual intercourse of a student by a teacher, a gross act of indecency, and supplying cannabis.

At Sydney's Downing Centre Local Court today, Phillips' barrister said his client denied the allegations and would be vigorously defending the charges.

The case has been adjourned until June 23 and Phillips has been excused from attending.

His bail has been continued on the condition he makes no contact with witnesses or their families.

Phillips is the sixth man to be charged over alleged sexual abuse at the school between 1960 and 1993.

All of those charged are either former teachers or former staff.

There are at least 16 alleged victims and Bathurst detectives have called on any more to come forward.

Read more...

Accused Priest Kevin Francis Phillips Pleads Not Guilty

Link
05/05/09

A PRACTICING priest has been granted bail after facing a Sydney court charged with sexual assault offences at Saint Stanislaus Boarding School in Bathurst.

Queensland man Kevin Francis Phillips, 58, appeared in Downing Centre Local Court to face the charges after turning himself in to NSW Police yesterday.

He is the seventh man charged with sexual offences at the school between 1963 and 1990. Others charged include a former principal, former vice-principal and former chaplain. Police say almost 200 charges have been laid in total.

Phillips's charges include attempting homosexual intercourse by a teacher on a student, gross act of indecency and supplying a prohibited drug.

Phillips did not speak as his matter was briefly mentioned but his lawyer, Greg Walsh, indicated outside court his client would plead "absolutely not guilty".

"He emphatically denies it," Mr Walsh said.

Mr Walsh added that his client continued to practice as a priest in Queensland.

Phillips's bail was continued with added conditions that he may not contact any Crown witnesses except through a lawyer.

His matter next goes to court on June 23.

Read more...

Abuse, The Globe, and the 'Power of God'

Link
05/04/09

BGfuture.jpg

For the last several weeks, as my friends in the media have circled the Globe in a sometimes sympathetic and sometimes eager death watch, I have found myself wondering whether I was the only one curious about what Cardinal Bernard F. Law must be thinking.

It's now been 17 years since that spring day when Law, frustrated by the news media's intensive coverage of a former priest, James R. Porter, who was a serial pedophile, called for divine intervention. In one of the most famous lines Law ever uttered, he said, while speaking at a Roxbury church, "By all means we call down God's power on the media, particularly the Globe."

In the years since, that quote has been twisted (I often hear people say that Law called down the "wrath of God" on the Globe) and, Law argued, misinterpreted (he later claimed that "power" was a relatively benign word). Here's an exchange Law had with attorney Eric MacLeish about the 1992 remark in a 2002 deposition:

Q: Do you remember saying those words, words like that?

A. I don't remember saying words like that, but, you know, calling down God's power is not calling down God's wrath.

Q. I'm not suggesting it is.

A. Yes. And I don't think that would be a bad thing to do, even today, to call down God's power on the news media, including even the Globe, yes. I think that would be good.

I think what Law meant at the time was that he wanted God to influence the Globe, but it's been widely interpreted as Law seeking to punish the paper, and now, with our cash-strapped corporate parent, The New York Times Company, threatening to shut us down if we don't slash spending, apparently I'm not the only one recalling that quotation.

The inestimable Rocco Palmo, blogging over at Whispers in the Loggia, revels in the irony for all it's worth (including the fact that the supposedly make-or-break negotiations are taking place at a Catholic parish in Weymouth (one that, by the way, is rich with metaphoric potential -- it burned to the ground a few years back (act of God?) but had good insurance (miracle?) and has now been rebuilt (reborn?)). Here's Rocco:

"In 1992, Cardinal Bernard Law famously called down "the power of God" on the Boston media, "particularly the Globe," over its dogged coverage of the region's first public case of a predator priest.

Nine years later, the paper's "courageous, comprehensive" reporting on abuse in the Beantown church itself opened the floodgates of the most devastating scandal American Catholicism had ever known, paving the way to Law's resignation in disgrace and earning the broadsheet the 2003 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service.

These days, however, in the direst sign of the state of newspapers everywhere, it's the 137 year-old Globe that faces the ax, with its owner demanding $20 million in union concessions and negotiations continuing past a midnight deadline at -- of all places -- a suburban parish.''

I have to say I've had lots of kind e-mail from Catholics and other religious folks saying they're praying that the Globe will survive, or just thinking caringly about those of us who work here. But of course my blog, like others around Boston.com, has had its share of comments from people who claim they just can't wait for us to die (but first they want to post one more observation....). And although all the archdiocesan leaders I've spoken with, including Cardinal Sean P. O'Malley, have been sympathetic, at least one church employee is not so sure -- Domenico Bettinelli, who works in fundraising for the archdiocese, blogged:

"Perhaps the Globe outpaced the populace and went further left faster than the people could be brought along. Oh sure, the glitterati and the politicians that the Globe is supposed to cover have all come out of the woodwork to lament the possible loss of the newspaper.

But the people have been voting with their pocketbooks for years, dropping their subscriptions to the newspaper with every bizarre anti-Bush screed or anti-Catholic editorial cartoon. Herald columnist Howie Carr has gleefully filled up not one but two recent columns full of the Globe's follies, including some shoddy reporting in which the desire to advance a liberal cause resulted in retractions because they just didn't get the story right. After a while, the people began to notice.

Will it be the end of the world if the Globe shutters its doors? Competition is always better for the consumer, so I'd prefer two healthy competitors in this market to one, even if the one I prefer was the winner. On the other hand, if the business can't offer a product that the consumer wants, then let another take his place."

And even my former colleague, David Warsh, gets into the act, delivering what strikes me as an outrageous kick-when-down to the Globe:

"The pedophile priest story reflected a familiar tactic in building newspaper circulation. Newspapers are often described as an essentially two-sided market, meaning that both readers and advertisers each pay a share, but there is a significant third side to newspaper markets as well, a non-pecuniary one that influences readers' and advertisers' willingness to pay for the product.

This is the realm of peer opinion in the newspaper industry, reflected in prizes, medals and general reputation. There is always some risk when seeking the good opinion of the profession of seeming to appeal over the heads of readers...It is hard to evaluate what the vigor of the Globe's pursuit of the story of the church's tolerance of sexual abuse by priests cost the paper in good will."

I don't actually believe the Globe is going to close, and, if it does, I don't believe our coverage of clergy sexual abuse will have had anything to do with it -- our problems are financial, and they are shared by all kinds of papers with all kinds of journalistic histories -- and I find it slightly shocking that a blog about economics would even suggest otherwise.


I also think it's kind of insane, and insulting, to imply that the abuse story was aimed "over the heads of readers" -- I've never been involved with any story that provoked more engagement and reaction from readers, or one that readers said was more significant to their own lives. But whatever one thinks, the story has clearly become a defining part of the paper's history -- I noticed in an NECN story about the Globe's past yesterday that sex abuse and busing were the only two stories mentioned -- and, whatever our future holds, it will be part of our legacy.

Read more...

Priest Sex Abuse:Former Priest Gets Life In Prison For Raping Boy

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

Link

A former Akron Catholic priest was sentenced to life in prison without parole for the 1992 rape of an 8-year-old boy.Joseph Williams, 64, was a priest from 1969 to 1976. The jury found his guilty of three counts of rape and kidnapping.The jury also learned that Williams sexually molested a 12-year-old boy beginning in 1984. These crimes occurred outside of Summit County, prosecutors said.

Read more...

Priest Accused:Former Grand Prairie Priest Sentenced to 51-Month Prison Term for Viewing Child Porn

Link
12/02/09

A former Grand Prairie priest who pleaded guilty to downloading hundreds of images of nude boys on a church computer in 2005 was sentenced Tuesday to more than four years in prison.

U.S. District Judge Sam Lindsay ordered Matthew Bagert, 40, who was married last year and has a 9-month-old son, to report to prison Jan. 19.

Bagert will remain on supervised release for three years after serving his 51-month prison sentence. He is likely to have to register as a sex offender for life, officials said.

Bagert pleaded guilty in April after being indicted in federal court last fall after downloading sexually explicit photos of nude boys as young as 4.

Prosecutors say investigators found more than 600 images on his computer at Immaculate Conception Catholic Church in Grand Prairie. Bagert told investigators he had been viewing child porn since he was a priest at St. Mark the Evangelist Catholic Church in Plano in 1997.

Before Lindsay imposed the sentence Tuesday, Bagert asked for probation. He said he had received counseling from the Shalom Center, a clergy treatment facility near Houston, and was in therapy to treat his urge to view child porn. He has never been charged with molesting children.

"I've worked to understand why I was attracted to pictures of young boys," he said, saying his child porn habit was a product of his being pushed into the priesthood by his parents and being pressured into a sexual relationship with a male mentor in the seminary.

"I know what I did was wrong," he said. "I've learned how to live as a mature and integrated man."

Bagert's wife, Melissa, said the pair met when Bagert was a priest at St. Mark and she was a physical education teacher at the school. They began dating after he was accused and left the priesthood, and traded letters while he was away at treatment. They married in April 2008, after the state case was dismissed but before his federal indictment.

Read more...

Priest Sex Abuse: Former Priest Sentenced To Prison

Link
12/02/09

A former Grand Prairie priest has been sentenced to more than 4 years in jail for possessing child pornography. 40 year old Matthew Bagert admitted to having the porn back in April and will have to register as a sex offender.

It was back in February of 2005 police executed a search warrant at the Immaculate Conception Catholic Church after getting word Father Bagert was viewing images on a computer there.

Read more...

Priest Sex Abuse: St. Louis County Man Pleads Guilty...

Link
12/03/09

ST. LOUIS -- A St. Louis County man arrested in an undercover sting into sex trafficking of children has pleaded guilty to federal charges.

Prosecutors announced the guilty plea Thursday for 24-year-old David Hawkey of Florissant. Sentencing is March 11. Attorneys for Hawkey did not return phone calls seeking comment.

Hawkey was among three men arrested in the sting in July. Matthew Nichol previously pleaded guilty and will be sentenced Dec. 11.

The third suspect, the Rev. James Grady, is scheduled for trial March 1. The 58-year-old is a Catholic priest suspended with pay by the Archdiocese of St. Louis pending the outcome of his case.

In the sting, undercover police placed Internet ads offering young women for sex. Authorities say Hawkey sought to purchase sex with a 14-year-old girl.


Read more...

Priest Sex Abuse: Egan Paid Accused Priest

Link

While he resisted compensation for an alleged victim of a disgraced priest, Bridgeport's then-Bishop Edward M. Egan gave the accused clergyman as much as $17,000 to settle bank debts and pay for a criminal-defense lawyer, court documents show.


The unusual payment - made in 1989 after the Rev. Gavin O'Connor had been accused of molesting boys for years and was in the process of leaving the priesthood - was later condemned by the plaintiff's attorney in court as "a payoff" intended to buy O'Connor's silence in the case pending against him and the diocese.


During a March 4, 1998, pretrial hearing, a Hartford Superior Court judge found the hush-money allegation plausible enough to allow testimony about it during the upcoming trial, but the diocese avoided that possibility when it abruptly settled the case for an undisclosed sum the very next day. The court file was sealed and has since been destroyed.


A transcript of the hearing, obtained by The Courant, shows that the diocese argued that church law required Egan to pay O'Connor's personal debts because he was "removing the man's ability to practice his professional calling." The diocese denied that the payment was an inducement for O'Connor to avoid testifying.


The disputed payment has emerged as the latest example of deferential treatment that Egan, now a cardinal and archbishop in New York, exhibited toward several priests accused of sexual misconduct during his tenure in Bridgeport - treatment he didn't extend to the victims of sexual abuse, critics say.


Egan gave thousands of dollars to O'Connor, even though, Egan later testified, he found the allegations against him so substantial that O'Connor became the only accused priest that Egan successfully "laicized" - or defrocked - during his tenure in Bridgeport. At the same time, the diocese aggressively fought O'Connor's accusers in court, battling one complainant for six years before settling.


"What I find grossly lacking is any sense of equitable compassion for the victims," said the Rev. Thomas Doyle, a priest who is an expert in canon law and has testified in numerous cases of clergy misconduct.


"Egan did nothing - nothing - for victims in Bridgeport except infuriate them and further victimize them," Doyle said. "I've never seen anybody in my 17 years of dealing with this issue as heartless as Egan, and as callous in his treatment of the victims."


David Clohessy, national director of Survivors Network for Those Abused by Priests, said the lump-sum cash payment by Egan to O'Connor "raises a red flag" because it was so unusual. However, he said, the current clergy sex-abuse scandal has shown that it is not uncommon for bishops to take steps to assist accused priests in more general ways.


"What the Bridgeport bishop did was no different than what [Boston] Cardinal Bernard Law did repeatedly: enable their personal feelings for the brother priest to cloud their judgment about what's right and what's best for children," said Clohessy.


In a statement issued late Friday, Egan's spokesman, Joseph Zwilling, not only defended Egan's handling of the O'Connor case, but said it was "a textbook example of how to treat a case of sexual abuse of minors by a priest."


"It is outrageous to suggest anything else," Zwilling said.


According to Zwilling, Egan took immediate action to suspend O'Connor within weeks of his appointment as bishop in December 1988, and later personally delivered O'Connor's petition for laicization to Rome. As Egan's lawyer did during the 1998 court hearing, Zwilling defended the cash payment to O'Connor, saying "all bishops are required by canon law to provide for the support of their priests."


Doyle disputed Egan's claims about that requirement. A bishop must provide financial assistance only when a priest is destitute as a result of a penalty imposed on him by the bishop, Doyle said.


In O'Connor's case, the priest was employed as a federal prison chaplain in Arizona in 1989, earning $34,000 to $44,000 a year. He later went to work at a federal prison in San Diego, and retired from the federal prison chaplaincy in 1998, according to the U.S. Bureau of Prisons. Today, he co-owns a real estate office in San Diego.


"[Egan's] not required to pay off his bank loans and he's not required to support him," Doyle said.


O'Connor was accused in two lawsuits of molesting three boys from the same family from 1977 to 1985. One of the boys attempted suicide in 1985, prompting the disclosure of the abuse to the diocese in 1986 by his family.


Two of the brothers sued in 1988, a lawsuit that Zwilling said was settled in 1989 shortly after Egan became bishop of Bridgeport. The third brother sued in 1992, and the diocese fought that case until the settlement in 1998.


Allegations of the payoff that are included in the March 1998 courtroom transcript are also referenced in a chapter of a book written by the presiding judge in the case, Richard Rittenband, and recently excerpted in the Connecticut Law Tribune. In it, Rittenband wrote that "charges of a payoff were too serious to permit a blanket preclusion of testimony."


The plaintiff's attorney, Hubert Santos of Hartford, told Rittenband he had evidence that Egan and his aide, Monsignor Lawrence Bronkiewicz, paid O'Connor between $12,000 and $17,000 around the time the bishop was asking O'Connor to request laicization from the priesthood. Santos cited correspondence from O'Connor to another priest - documents that remain under seal and are unavailable - that he said showed the money was part of a "side deal" to keep O'Connor quiet.

Read more...

St. John's Monks Accused of Major Sex Crime Cover-Up

Link
12/08/09


COLLEGEVILLE, Minn. - What some might call a disturbing lawsuit was filed in Stearns County Tuesday alleging the cover-up of nearly 25 years of sex crimes committed by 11 Benedictine monks at St. John's Abbey.

In the lawsuit, filed by the alleged victim Jeremiah McCarthy, the Benedictines are accused of fraud by intentionally concealing evidence and protecting predatory priests who are either at St. John's or who have spent time there.

"St. John's had an entire culture of concealed sexual misconduct by their priests and they had numerous priests at the Abbey, at St. John's Prep and at St. John's University who were sexually abusing kids consistently, year after year," McCarthy's attorney Patrick Noaker said.

The lawsuit was made public during a press conference at the Stearns County Courthouse Tuesday where McCarthy spoke for the first time.

McCarthy alleges the late Father Bruce Wollmering sexually victimized him during various school sponsored activities in 1971.

He also said he did not report the abuse at the time, but that after learning of Father Wollerming's death and subsequent accusations from other alleged victims he felt it was time to come forward.

"It definitely changed my idea of not only the church, my religion, priests, but yes, God, too," McCarthy said.

The lawsuit also lists the names of ten other priests and dozens of similar acts of sexual misconduct allegedly covered up by church officials.

St. John's released a public statement Tuesday afternoon saying the school does not tolerate any type of sexual misconduct.

The statement reads:

"Saint John's has learned of a possible lawsuit earlier today, which we plan to carefully review. The individual named in the lawsuit was the subject of a press release by the abbey in July of 2006. Saint John's takes the issue of sexual misconduct very seriously, and over many years, has worked to ensure that policies and procedures on human rights are followed and enforced. Saint John's policies are clear and longstanding: we do not tolerate sexual misconduct in any form."

Noaker said the next step will be for St. John's to answer each allegation. After enough information is gathered, the lawsuit might proceed to trial.

Read more...

Milwaukee Former Archbishop Accused of Shredding Documents

|

The Wisconsin Radio Network reports that former Milwaukee Catholic Archbishop Rembert Weakland shredded documents he received regarding sexual abuse by priests on a routine basis. The Milwaukee County District Attorney now has sealed testimony that outlines Weakland's actions. These shredded documents included admissions by priests of abuse, it is claimed. This serious matter is in the process of being investigated by the D.A.

Read more...

Priest Sex Abuse: 2 Clergymen Who Hid Abuse Still Working

Link

As the Bridgeport Diocese tries to move beyond the priest sex abuse scandal, the release of 12,000 documents has revealed the roles key diocesan leaders played in the cover-up. Two bishops involved in the concealment are gone, yet two key church leaders

Among the thousands of documents released last week by the Roman Catholic Diocese of Bridgeport were depositions and other papers that revealed the involvement of former Bishops Walter Curtis and Edward Egan in the cover-up of alleged sexual abuse of children by priests in the diocese.

But the documents also detail how two senior diocesan prelates, Monsignors William Genuario and Laurence Bronkiewicz, reviewed sex abuse complaints against priests and gave orders to move them around. Both men remain active in the diocese and hold senior positions.

Genuario is currently head of the diocese's tribunal, a court where people can bring petitions to adjudicate issues involving their rights or status. Bronkiewicz is pastor of St. Mary's Church in Ridgefield, one of the wealthiest parishes in the diocese.

"I have no comment on anything," said Genuario when reached at his diocese office. A receptionist at St. Mary's said Bronkiewicz is on a retreat and could not be reached. The diocese did not return calls or respond to e-mails asking for comment.

At a time when the diocese is striving to put the sex abuse scandal behind it, pointing to Bishop William E. Lori's public apology after he took office in 2001, his swift suspension of implicated priests and enactment of a model program to prevent abusive behavior, the release of the documents on Tuesday has led to a fresh chorus of protests and demands.

Some of that is directed at the continued church leadership roles played by Genuario and Bronkiewicz.

"This is precisely why child sex crimes and cover-ups in the church continue: because those who conceal felonies are rewarded, not punished, time and time and time again, in Connecticut and across the world," said David Clohessy, national director of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests.

"Let's get real: why would church officials and employees reform, when virtually none of the thousands of priests, nuns, bishops or cardinals who keep secrets, protect predators, stonewall police, ignore victims, and deceive parishioners have ever even lost one day's pay? Given what amounts to essentially an enormous endorsement of wrongdoing, only the most naive would believe that anyone in such a system would voluntarily 'reform.'"

Added Cindy Robinson, of the Bridgeport law firm Tremont & Sheldon, who has represented more than two dozen people abused by priests in the diocese, "The newly released documents show that priests who helped hide clergy sex abuse were rewarded by the hierarchy of the church. This was because they were protecting the church from scandal."

All told, the diocese by 2003 had agreed to pay $37.7 million to settle dozens of claims of sex abuse committed by priests against minors, many of them altar boys.

Genuario's role

Genuario was ordained a priest in the diocese in 1956. He was appointed chancellor in 1970, and in 1978 he became vicar general of the diocese, the right-hand man of then Bishop Curtis.

In the early 1960s complaints were made to the diocese that the Rev. Laurence Brett had been sexually abusing children.

A male Sacred Heart University student complained that Brett, then chaplain at Sacred Heart, had sexually abused him. The student said he had gone to Brett for counseling on a sexuality problem and during the session the priest had asked to examine the student's penis. During the examination, he said, Brett began performing oral sex on the student and then bit the teenager's penis, causing the student to have a medical problem.

The incident was discussed in a letter written by Genuario on Dec. 2, 1964. The letter states that Brett admitted to the incident.

The letter went on to state that Brett was to be taken away. "A recurrence of hepatitis was to be feigned should anyone ask."

In his deposition, released with other documents, Genuario admitted that not only did he prepare the so-called hepatitis letter but he also typed it himself. Asked by then-victims' lawyer, T. Paul Tremont, why he did it, Genuario added, "I was the vice chancellor at the time and was called in to (do the work)."

A few days later, Genuario met with another man, Mark Frechette, who had claimed he was abused by Brett. "He really has his astrology down !!!" Genuario wrote in a memo. Frechette later committed suicide.

In the deposition Genuario acknowledged he at one time spoke to a woman who complained she had an affair with Monsignor Gregory Smith. Smith would later confess to Bishop William Lori that he abused two young women at St. Theresa's Parish and was suspended.

"She called me as a married woman, I believe, toward the end of 1980s, and she wanted me, as I remember, to advise her as to what to do because she was going to be at a religious function in which Monsignor Smith was going to be, and that she could not -- she did not want to be there and she wanted the whole situation changed," Genuario said in his deposition.

Tremont then asked Genuario if he had then contacted Monsignor Andrew Cusack, who was in charge of handling sexual abuse complaints against priests at that time.

Genuario replied that he had not.

Tremont later asked Genuario if he denied never telling parishioners that a priest was being sent away because of sexual misconduct.

"I'm not going to deny it," he said.

What Bronkiewicz did

Bronkiewicz was ordained into the priesthood in 1973. Initially assigned to St. Mary's Parish in Stamford, he was sent to Rome to complete a graduate degree in theology. In 1987 he was appointed Episcopal Vicar for Clergy at the diocese, making him the supervisor of all the diocese's priests. Bronkiewicz would later be appointed chancellor of the diocese by then-Bishop Egan, and eventually he took on the title of diocese administrator after Egan left in 2000 to become New York's cardinal.

In 1968, the Rev. Martin Federici, then a teacher at the former Central Catholic High School in Norwalk, was accused of molesting a teenage boy. Federici was removed from his teaching assignment and appointed to Assumption parish in Westport. Ten years later he was again accused of molesting a boy while at St. Thomas the Apostle Parish in Norwalk.

In November 1978, he was sent for evaluation to a New York psychologist after he was caught stealing $50 a week from the church's collection. But just days before he was to leave he was pulled over by Westport police after they spotted him driving with a young boy in his car. The boy claimed Federici had been rubbing his leg. A police lieutenant reported the incident to the diocese, and no other action was taken.

Although the psychologist found Federici "has a very poor contact with reality," in 1981 he was appointed pastor at St. Joseph Church in Shelton. Two years later he was accused of sexually assaulting a teenage boy in the rectory. Federici was subsequently assigned to St. Edward the Confessor Church in New Fairfield.

On March 21, 1994, Bronkiewicz wrote a letter to New York psychiatrist Louis Padovano, informing him that he will be sending Federici to him for further evaluation.

"I met with Father Federici on March 14, 1994, to review the enclosed background as well as discuss a recently reported incident involving an eighth-grade boy in All Saints' School in Norwalk where Father Federici goes on Mondays to lead discussions in the three eighth-grade classes," the monsignor wrote.

Two months later Bronkiewicz issued a memo to diocese officials dated May 31, 1994:

"Effective today, Reverend Martin J. Federici begins a sabbatical of indefinite length for the purpose of personal growth. Should you receive any inquiries from parishioners of Saint Matthew Parish or others concerning Father Federici please confirm what was announced at the weekend Masses, that Father Federici requested and was granted a sabbatical by the Diocese."

On July 23, 1996, just days after the diocese was served with a lawsuit accusing Federici of abusing children, Bronkiewicz wrote Federici telling him he had been suspended from his priestly faculties.

Although there had been several complaints of the Rev. Charles Carr abusing children followed by the priest spending time at the Institute of Living counseling center, in June 1990 Bronkiewicz wrote Carr, informing him he had been appointed Parochial Vicar at St. Philip Church in Norwalk. But the letter informs Carr he was "restricted from ministry to pre-adolescents and adolescents."

More allegations would later surface of Carr having abused children, but it was not until March 30, 1995, one day after the diocese was served with a lawsuit accusing Carr of abuse, that Bronkiewicz wrote Carr a letter telling him he had been suspended.

Also included among the documents released Tuesday is a memorandum from Bronkiewicz informing other diocese officials, "In view of the allegations contained in the civil suit served on us yesterday, the faculties of Reverend Walter P. Coleman have been withdrawn."

Moving forward

More than 12,000 documents were released by the diocese Tuesday, the culmination of an eight-year legal battle by four newspapers to make the records public. The documents contain affidavits from alleged victims and their families, depositions from accused priests and from church officials, letters written by church leaders, transcripts of hearing testimony and a variety of motions filed by attorneys for the diocese and for the victims.

The diocese had steadfastly opposed the release of the records, saying that many of the records had been given to a court under protective orders that they be sealed and that no public interest was served by their release. The diocese also argued that exhaustive news media coverage in the 1990s and 2000s already had fully aired the cases.

The 87-parish diocese serves more than 460,000 registered Catholics in Fairfield County and has 242 priests, according to its Web site.

The sex abuse allegations in Bridgeport mirrored those that surfaced in several other dioceses across the United States in the early 2002, including in Boston, Los Angeles, Dallas and San Diego. Church officials authorized the payment of hundreds of millions of dollars in settlements and enacted policies they said would prevent abusive priests from going unpunished and would provide a safe haven for all Catholics to practice their faith.


Read more...

Catholic Church Clears Priest of Abuse

Link

The Roman Catholic church says it has exonerated a Long Island priest of allegations that he molested a teenager.

Monsignor Alan Placa is a close friend of former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and went to work at his consulting business after the accusations were lodged against him in 2002.

The Diocese of Rockville Centre, east of New York City, said in a statement on Friday that a panel in Rome had concluded Placa was innocent.

The church says Placa may resume his ministry. Bishop William Murphy says the diocese will do what it can to "restore his good name".

The alleged victim tells Newsday he is "astonished" by the finding. Now 50, Richard Tollner says he was abused by Placa in 1975, when he was in high school.

Placa has repeatedly denied the accusation.

Read more...

HIDDEN AND PROTECTED PEDOPHILE PRIESTS

By
James Bredin


These hidden and protected pedophile priests will have to go,
But the authoritative and secretive bishops said no,
They just moved them from parish to parish to continue their deeds,
And the faithful never even knew that they had been deceived.


These pedophile priests brought a bad name to all the other priests,
Especially since the pedophiles were never told to cease,
So how many other pedophiles are hidden among the clergy?
Planning their next concealed criminal pedophile orgy.


The pedophile priests may be bad but the bishops are much worse,
They assisted the pedophiles in this terrible curse,
The terrible sexual abuse of children on a grand scale,
They didn't get charged criminally so they never needed bail.

Read more...

HIDDEN AND PROTECTED PEDOPHILE PRIESTS

By
James Bredin


These hidden and protected pedophile priests will have to go,
But the authoritative and secretive bishops said no,
They just moved them from parish to parish to continue their deeds,
And the faithful never even knew that they had been deceived.


These pedophile priests brought a bad name to all the other priests,
Especially since the pedophiles were never told to cease,
So how many other pedophiles are hidden among the clergy?
Planning their next concealed criminal pedophile orgy.


The pedophile priests may be bad but the bishops are much worse,
They assisted the pedophiles in this terrible curse,
The terrible sexual abuse of children on a grand scale,
They didn't get charged criminally so they never needed bail.

Read more...

Pedophile Priestly Portrayal

Link

By
James Bredin


I can now see who they are by name, diocese, or US state,
Pedophile priests in alphabetical order without debate,
Lawsuits, criminal charges, bishops' assistance and priests who fled,
Thanks to the Internet which pompous criminal bishops dread.


More graphic stories could not have come out of the depths of hell,
The Americans, unlike the Irish, have journalists who tell,
Child molesters employed as priests teaching children research,
This is not some government scandal, this is the Catholic Church.


Pompous secretive bishops cover for their criminal priests,
Squelch anything that could lead to embarrassment in the least,
Molestation complaints kept secret from the community for years,
While accused and abused children often lived in fear and tears.
Dec 4th, 2009

Read more...

Hundreds File Abuse Claims Against Jesuits

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Link
12/06/09

SPOKANE, Wash. (AP) — More than 500 people have filed claims accusing Jesuits of sexually abusing children across the Northwest.

The claims vary in severity and span decades and geography.

People were required to file their accusations by Nov. 30, a deadline imposed by the federal judge overseeing the Chapter 11 bankruptcy of the Oregon Province of the Society of Jesus. That organization includes Jesuits in Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Oregon and Washington.


The Jesuits already have settled 200 sex-abuse claims.

The Jesuits claim to have so far spent about $25 million. In bankruptcy documents the Jesuits claim to have $4.8 million in assets and liabilities of $61.8 million.

Yet many of the 500 people left to seek payouts in Bankruptcy Court assert that the organization remains wealthy and that it misstated its financial standing in court records.

They contend the Jesuits control and own Gonzaga University, Gonzaga Preparatory School, Seattle University and other schools and properties. The ownership of Gonzaga and the other schools could be the dominant issue in the bankruptcy.

Gonzaga University is fighting efforts to link its fortunes to the province. Separately incorporated and registered 125 years ago, the private college with 7,200 students will not volunteer money or other resources to settle the bankruptcy, said Mike Casey, Gonzaga’s corporation counsel.

“We are not willing to either participate in this bankruptcy nor help resolve it,” Mr. Casey said.


Read more...

MoreThan 500 Claims Filed Against NW Jesuits

Link
12/07/09

SPOKANE, Wash. — More than 500 people in the Northwest filed claims against the Oregon Province of the Society of Jesus in advance of a November deadline, alleging members of the Catholic order sexually abused them as children.

The Spokesman-Review in Spokane reports the claims against the Jesuits span decades and range from Native Alaskan children to students at Spokane's Gonzaga Preparatory School.

A federal judge overseeing the Chapter 11 reorganization of the province set a Nov. 30 deadline for people to file the claims. The organization includes Jesuits in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana and Alaska.

The Jesuits already have settled 200 additional sex-abuse claims.

Information from: The Spokesman-Review, http://www.spokesman.com


Read more...

Sex Abuse Victims' Groups Outraged By Vatican Decision to Clear Accused Priest

Link

Catholic sex-abuse victims' groups are decrying a Vatican decision to clear a former high-ranking Long Island priest, and longtime friend of former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, of sex-abuse allegations.

The Diocese of Rockville Centre announced on Friday that the Catholic Church had found Monsignor Alan Placa not guilty of molesting teenage boys, an allegation that first surfaced in a local grand jury investigation in 2002. The grand jury report concluded that Placa could not be prosecuted criminally because the statute of limitations had expired.

Victims' rights groups harshly criticized the Catholic Church's decision and the process of trying the accused priest.

Read more...

High Court Refuses to Hear Appeal on Priest sex Abuse Documents

Link

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court Monday turned away another appeal to stop the release of documents generated for sexual abuse lawsuits against priests in a Roman Catholic diocese in Connecticut.


The court refused to hear an appeal from the Diocese of Bridgeport, which has been fighting for years to prevent the release of the documents. Last month, the justices refused to grant a delay at least while they considered the diocese’s full appeal.


The order was issued without comment.


The New York Times, The Boston Globe, The Washington Post and the Hartford Courant have asked to see the documents. The Connecticut Supreme Court has ruled that more than 12,000 pages from 23 lawsuits against the six priests should be unsealed.


The documents include depositions, affidavits and motions. The records have been under seal since the diocese settled the cases in 2001 and could shed light on how recently retired New York Cardinal Edward Egan handled the allegations when he was Bridgeport bishop.


The diocese says the First Amendment prohibits civil authorities from intruding into internal church decisions about priest assignments.


The diocese released a statement Monday saying church officials were disappointed with the decision, but will work with the Connecticut courts on releasing the documents.


“We continue to believe that the constitutional issues presented, including the First Amendment rights of religious organizations and the privacy rights of all citizens, are significant and important for the Court to consider,” the statement said.


The diocese also said there has been a “true culture change” in the church, and church leaders have worked hard to address clergy sexual abuse and support victims.


A hearing is planned Monday in Superior Court in Waterbury to determine when to release the documents.


The case is Bridgeport Diocese v. New York Times, 09-246.

Read more...

Priest Sex Abuse: Supreme Court Refuses to Stop Release of Documents in Priest Sex Cases

Link

WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States Supreme Court on Monday turned away a last-ditch appeal to stop the release of documents from sexual abuse lawsuits against priests in a Roman Catholic diocese in Connecticut.

The court refused to hear the appeal from the diocese, in Bridgeport, which has fought for years to prevent the release of the documents. Last month, the justices refused to grant a delay while they considered the diocese’s full appeal.

The order was issued without comment.

The New York Times, The Boston Globe, The Washington Post and The Hartford Courant have asked to see the documents. The Connecticut Supreme Court has ruled that more than 12,000 pages from 23 lawsuits against six priests should be unsealed.


The documents include depositions, affidavits and motions.

The records have been under seal since the diocese settled the cases in 2001. They could shed light on how Cardinal Edward M. Egan of New York handled the allegations when he was the bishop of Bridgeport.

The diocese says the First Amendment prohibits civil authorities from intruding in internal church decisions about priest assignments.

Read more...

Priest Sex Abuse: Priest Molestation Case Goes to Jury

Link

The jury in the federal case of a defrocked Jesuit priest accused of repeatedly molesting a boy left in his care was sent to deliberate late Thursday after attorneys in the case argued over whether the alleged victims of Donald McGuire were looking to bring in a financial windfall from the church in the form of a civil settlement.

McGuire’s attorney, Stephen Komie, suggested that the main victim in the case, known as Dominick, went to civil attorneys first to file a claim before reaching to anyone who might prosecute the case.

McGuire is accused of traveling, including out of the country, to engage in sex with Dominick. Komie said the trips had a strictly religious purpose and that Dominick had a reason to lie to the jury when he testified this month about alleged abuse.

“Money, money, money,” Komie said.

The lawyer described Dominick’s civil attorney who brought the claim against the church, the defendant’s nephew Kevin McGuire, a “puppet master” who brought other alleged victims together to concoct a story about McGuire. Jurors should take their time weighing a “classic reasonable doubt case,” he said.

In her rebuttal argument, Assistant U.S. Atty. Julie Ruder said it was no wonder that some of the alleged victims in the case took time to come forward, calling defense attempts to spin the evidence pathetic.

None of the victims “fabricated a horrific story of abuse” in search of some payday, she said, they were in court testifying to get a measure of justice.

Besides, the name of this case was not Dominick vs. Donald McGuire, she told the jury. This was not civil court.

“This is the United States of America vs. Donald McGuire,” she said. “We gave you corroboration for (Dominick)” in the form of other abuse victims.

Ruder called the case a nightmare for those victims and reminded the jury that the case was about years and years of McGuire’s efforts to keep his perverse double life concealed.

“It is over,” she said, her voice cracking with emotion. “It’s in your hands.”

Jeff Coen, Chicago Tribune

Read more...

Priest Sex Abuse: Priest in Teen sex Case now charged With Child Porn

Link

ST. LOUIS —
A Roman Catholic priest already accused of trying to pay for sex with a 16-year-old girl was indicted Thursday on new charges, including one involving child pornography.


The Rev. James P. Grady, 58, already faced a felony charge of attempting to obtain a minor for a commercial sex act.


The superseding indictment adds a claim that Grady possessed three pornographic images of young girls on a laptop computer. Prosecutors also added a felony charge of using interstate commerce to attempt to entice or coerce someone under 18 to engage in prostitution or sexual activity.


The laptop was searched after he was arrested in the summer at a sting run by the FBI and police from St. Louis County and Maryland Heights.


Prosecutors said Grady, then pastor of St. Raphael the Archangel Church in south St. Louis, responded to an online ad that offered two girls and used "hussyfan" and two other code words taken from child pornography that are often used to describe underage girls.


Grady allegedly exchanged e-mails with an undercover officer, then showed up July 29 at a house in St. Louis County and agreed to pay $80 for 30 minutes with the girl, asking for "kissing" and oral sex.



In testimony at a hearing last month, FBI Special Agent Cynthia Dockery said Grady allowed investigators to search his car, cell phone and laptop computer and told them that he responded to the ad because he was "curious."


In addition to the new criminal charges, prosecutors added a forfeiture count that could result in Grady losing his 2007 Toyota Camry, the car he used to drive to the site of his arrest.


His trial is scheduled for Jan. 19. The sex charges each carry a penalty of 10 years to life in prison; the child porn possession charge carries a maximum of 10 years.


St. Louis Archbishop Robert J. Carlson has suspended Grady pending the outcome of the case. A representative of the archdiocese declined to comment Thursday night, citing a policy of not commenting on pending cases.


Grady's lawyer did not return a call and an e-mail seeking comment.

Read more...

Deal Puts off Abuse Cases Against Parishes

Link
11/26/09

WILMINGTON – More than 100 plaintiffs who are suing the Catholic Diocese of Wilmington for child sexual abuse by diocesan priests agreed today not to pursue their claims against the parishes until the diocese’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy process is complete.

In exchange, the diocese and parishes agreed to release the personnel records of 11 priests named in the suits and data on the insurance policies it holds for such claims.


A series of eight jury trials -- all with claims related to former priest Francis G. DeLuca -- was to begin Oct. 19 in Delaware Superior Court. But the Diocese filed for bankruptcy the night before, putting all of the cases it faced on hold. Plaintiffs’ attorneys then argued that they should be able to continue their cases against the three parishes involved in those eight claims, because none of the parishes had filed for bankruptcy.


But today, attorney Thomas Neuberger – whose firm represents all eight plaintiffs – reached agreement with the diocese that his clients would not pursue the parishes in exchange for the records. And James Stang, representing the other plaintiffs, said they, too, would agree not to pursue separate cases against the parishes while the bankruptcy proceeding continued.


The agreement was reached before testimony was to begin in the courtroom of U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Christopher Sontchi.



Stang, attorney for the newly formed Committee of Unsecured Debtors – which represents all of the plaintiffs in abuse-related cases against the diocese – said the agreement would benefit all plaintiffs against the diocese, even those not represented by Neuberger.

“The committee is taking a bigger picture in view of how this relates to other lawsuits,” Stang said. “We believe it reflects pluses for all survivors, not just for the eight involved in this litigation. We believe it will move the case forward to accommodate the interests of our constituency.”


Diocese attorney Tony Flynn said the agreement will allow the diocese to focus its attention on the bankruptcy proceeding without having to tend to ongoing trials in Superior Court.


None of the diocese’s parishes has declared bankruptcy. The agreement includes records of diocesan priests only. Cases against priests in religious orders – including the Oblates of St. Francis de Sales and the Capuchin friars – are not part of the agreement. And none of the religious orders has filed for bankruptcy.

Read more...

Former LI Priest Accused of Molesting Boys Dies

Friday, December 4, 2009

ORIGINAL LINK

MAY 04/09

A former Roman Catholic priest who was one of the most notorious figures in the Diocese of Rockville Centre's child sex abuse scandal has died in Florida, authorities said.

Brian McKeon, 58, was found dead in his home in Port Richey, Fla., on Monday about 11:30 a.m., the Pasco County Sheriff's Office said. He had become sick at about 3 a.m., coughing up blood and suffering a seizure, a roommate told authorities.

McKeon refused medical care and became unresponsive after another seizure and vomiting more blood. The sheriff's report said McKeon, an unemployed nurse, suffered health problems, "most of which were believed to have been caused by Brian's chronic alcoholism."

But McKeon's death does not mean the numerous cases linked to him are over, Northport attorney Douglas McNally, who said he represents nine of McKeon's alleged victims, said Thursday.

If a bill in Albany becomes law, McNally said, victims could still file civil lawsuits against the diocese, charging negligent hiring and supervision of McKeon.

The bill, sponsored by Assemb. Margaret Markey (D- Maspeth), would drop the statute of limitations on child sex abuse cases for a year. McKeon was never charged with a crime, largely because the cases' statute of limitations had expired.

The church is fighting the bill, saying it could bankrupt it and that it is discriminatory because it does not include public institutions such as schools.

In 25 years as a priest, McKeon served in parishes in Holbrook, East Northport, Garden City and Mattituck. Diocesan spokesman Sean Dolan said Bishop William Murphy removed McKeon from active ministry in fall 2001 following accusations he had sexually molested boys. The pope laicized, or permanently removed, McKeon from the priesthood two years later.

The father of an alleged victim who testified before a Suffolk grand jury identified McKeon as "Priest C" in a report the jury issued in 2003. The report said McKeon "wreaked havoc" by abusing boys as young as 10. "For this, he was rewarded by being a pastor."

In a March 2002 interview with Newsday, McKeon acknowledged he had made "a mistake" more than a decade earlier by inappropriately touching boys. He said he had not been involved in any incident since, noting, "I was wrong, and I admitted I was wrong."


The Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests said, "Although the death of former Father Brian McKeon may bring him the peace he so sadly missed in this life, it will not bring peace to the many victims he molested/raped in the Diocese of Rockville Centre."

"The childhood innocence of so many were shattered," the group said, "because too many bishops, chancery officials, pastors, priests, parishioners chose to be silent and look the other way."

Dolan responded that "any victim of clergy abuse that has a credible claim - whether the case is legally time-barred or not - has been cared for by the church. We continue to encourage victims of abuse to come forward" to report abuse.

Read more...

Future of the Reverend Coyle Remains Uncertain

ORIGINAL LINK

Monday, May 4, 2009
By Richard C. Dujardin

Journal Staff Writer


In his 14 years as rector of Trinity Episcopal Church, in Newport, the Rev. Lorne Coyle hosted an impressive array of dignitaries, from Queen Elizabeth II to Archbishop Desmond Tutu. Then, in 1992, he left Rhode Island to join a diocese he felt was more in tune with his conservative views on sexual morality.

Now, Father Coyle is facing an uncertain future after his public admission that he had a sexual affair with a woman not his wife over a period of many years –– starting when he was in Newport.

Until February, Father Coyle was the lead minister of Christ Church, in Vero Beach, Fla., a breakaway parish of 400 members that he and others opened in a shopping mall last July as an alternative to a 2.4-million-member denomination they felt had grown too liberal, particularly on such issues as the ordination of a gay bishop and biblical interpretation.

To further underscore their break, Father Coyle and two other priests in the new parish had transferred their allegiance from the U.S. Episcopal Church to the Anglican Church of Uganda, which had formed a special province as a way of reaching out to disaffected Episcopalians.

All appeared to be going well for the charismatic 58-year-old married priest until earlier this year, when a woman wrote to the Right Rev. John Howe, the Episcopal bishop of Central Florida, alleging that the two had had a long-running affair.

Rhode Island Bishop Geralyn Wolf, whom Howe notified as a courtesy, said Wednesday that she was not certain why the woman had decided to tell officials now. But for whatever reason, she said, an accusation of clergy infidelity is a “very serious situation and demands a clear and concise response.”

Although Father Coyle is no longer under Episcopal Church jurisdiction because of his affiliation with the Ugandan church, the Episcopal bishops felt it important that the allegations be passed along to Bishop John Guernsey, the leader of the Church of Uganda’s American province. Things came to a head, according to the Rev. Robert Stull, new interim rector of Christ Church in Vero Beach, when Bishop Guernsey confronted Father Coyle with the accusations during a visit to the church and suspended him of all priestly duties as of 2 p.m. Sunday, Feb. 1.

Hours before the suspension was to take effect, Father Stull said, Father Coyle took to the pulpit and stunned his parishioners by confirming that he was involved in sexual misconduct with a woman not his wife over a period of years. Then, after asking forgiveness, he left before the closing recessional.

Bishop Guernsey announced that the priest would remain under suspension until the completion of an investigation, and a week later he accepted Father Coyle’s resignation from the parish.

Even so, Father Coyle has not been officially defrocked, and Bishop Guernsey sent an e-mail to The Journal on Tuesday confirming that “no determination” had been made on what was to become of the wayward priest. In the meantime, Father Coyle has been told he is not to meet or speak with members of the congregation, though they are still permitted to send him notes.

Father Coyle left word through an intermediary Monday that he did not wish to speak to The Journal.

Bishop Wolf, who became the bishop of Rhode Island in 1996, four years after Father Coyle left the state, said people might get the impression from the media that such things occur often, “but I’ve had to deal with only two in the last four years.”

In both cases, she said, the offending clergy confessed their sin, expressed “extreme remorse” and vowed to amend their lives. “Few people are willing to stand up publicly and do that, and I honor their courage,” she said.

But such declarations of remorse and repentance are not enough to warrant reinstating an offending priest, in Bishop Wolf’s view.

“I don’t know what the procedure is for the Church of Uganda,” she said, but in the last two cases that she has dealt with here, the priests renounced their orders and weren’t permitted to serve as Episcopal priests.

Though Bishop Wolf declined to name one of the two priests who were disciplined, she acknowledged that one of them was the Rev. Jonathan Ostman, who abruptly resigned as rector of St. John the Evangelist Church, Newport, while on a missionary trip to Africa in 2006. Although the reasons for Father Ostman’s abrupt departure were not disclosed at the time, Bishop Wolf said Wednesday that the priest renounced his ordination in the Episcopal Church after he learned he had been accused of sexual misconduct.

The priest is now the rector of St. John the Baptist, an Anglican traditionalist parish in Marshall, Va., which he joined in 2007. He did not return calls placed to his phone Wednesday.

In a 1992 Journal interview, then-Canon Coyle said he decided to leave Trinity Church, in Newport, one of the oldest Episcopal churches in the country, and move with his wife and two children to Florida not out of unhappiness with the parish but because he felt he had accomplished all he wanted to do.

He recalled not only the visits of the Queen Elizabeth II and South African Archbishop Tutu, but the time when the Most Rev. Donald Coogan, then archbishop of Canterbury, came to the church and ended up pushing Father Coyle’s car out of the snow.

Even then, Father Coyle was well known for his conservative views, especially regarding sex. As a clergy delegate from Rhode Island to the U.S. Episcopal Church’s General Convention in 1991, he publicly criticized the Right Rev. George N. Hunt, then bishop of Rhode Island, for calling for the creation of a liturgy to bless same-sex marriages.

He reiterated his opposition in The Journal interview a year later, heaping praise on the man who was about to be his new boss, Bishop Howe of Central Florida, for his fight for a failed resolution that would have called on Episcopal clergy to abstain from sexual relations outside marriage.

Remarking about the apparent disconnect between the priest’s words and actions, Bishop Wolf said that “sometimes those who are most agitated about certain things have an emotional connection that we don’t always see on the surface.”

Yet it is also true, she said, that all people have sinned at one time or the other and have a need to seek repentance and forgiveness.



Read more...

Catholic Church Continues Efforts to Avoid Accountability

Link

05/03/09

[head_bishops.jpg]

A battle continues to rage in New York State over legislation that would modify the statute of limitations for bring sexual abuse lawsuits against the Catholic Church and other organizations. True to form - and despite crocodile tears of sorrow over the abuse of thousands of children and youths - the leadership of the Roman Catholic Church is fighting like a bunch of Mafia dons to kill the legislation which would open the Church up to potentially many more lawsuits. Let's be clear, the Church leadership's only sorrow (and that includes from Pope Benedict XVI on down) is over the fact that the truth got out and the Church has had to pay out huge sums of its precious money.
*
On April 24th - likely after much lobbying by the Church - Newsday came out with an editorial against the legislation. In part the editorial read as follows:
*
Righting the church's wrongs is not the role of the State Legislature. Under consideration in Albany is an ill-advised bill that would tamper with the deadlines for bringing childhood sexual abuse lawsuits. It would allow a one-year opportunity to file retroactive claims for compensation and punitive damages regardless of when the abuse occurred - in some cases, 30, 40 or 50 years ago.
*
This political effort is so alarming because it clearly targets the Catholic Church. Although other religions and private institutions, such as the Boy Scouts, would also be subject to the law, the Markey bill leaves in place the time ban for lawsuits against public institutions. This is a glaring omission. More sexual abuse of minors has been documented as occurring in public schools than as being perpetrated by Catholic clergy. The public schools are exempt, however, because the powerful teachers unions objected to this unfair law.
*
Albany lawmakers, whose politically motivated decisions typically suggest neither careful deliberation nor thoughtful action, are entering a dangerous area. They risk permitting a secular legal system to decide what a religious community owes its aggrieved faithful.To do so is to join in the desire for revenge against a very powerful and wealthy institution. But revenge is not justice.
*
Fortunately, some are speaking out against the effort to give the Church a pass and allow gross misdeeds to be swept forever under the rug. As a former Catholic, I am convinced that the ONLY thing that will bring the Church to address its past sins - other than by blaming gays - is more bad publicity in respect to sex abuse lawsuits and the pay off of additional large sums of money, the Church's true God. Among those speaking out is Irwin M. Zalkin who has handled lawsuits against the Catholic Church. True, Mr. Zalkin and his firm have made a great deal of money in the process, but he has also seen at close hand the pernicious evil within the Church leadership. Here are some highlights on Zalkin's response:
*
"The Newsday Editorial of April 24 2009, entitled "Keep the State out of the Church," calls for the State Legislature to abandon the principle of accountability to survivors of the historical scourge of childhood sexual abuse," stated Zalkin. As Zalkin explains: "While conceding that the Catholic Church harbored sexual predators, the Newsday editors argue that due to the passage of time survivors of this wrongful conduct should not be provided their day in court. Under the editors' reasoning, neither judge nor jury should be allowed to weigh the evidence of such wrongful harboring of predators and the damage it caused. Instead, due to the mere fact that one day has followed another, survivors, their families, their employers, and society at large must pay for the cost of the damage. Damage inflicted by religious corporations when they committed wrongful acts in their dealings with pedophiles, ephebophiles, and children."
*
Zalkin offers the report of the Suffolk County Supreme Court, Special Grand Jury Report, released in February of 2003, as proof that the evidence of these crimes still exist. "In the Diocese of Rockville Center, average citizens, members of a grand jury, armed with subpoena power were able to uncover substantial evidence, both in the form of documents and percipient witness testimony, of the historical fact of childhood sexual abuse committed by religious leaders in their community," explains Zalkin. "The grand jury uncovered evidence that the local diocese had protected at least 58 abusive priests. The diocese engaged in aggressive tactics that purported to help victims and their families but that actually used intimidation, claims of confidentiality, hush payments, and other means to cover-up abusive conduct."
*
"The United States Supreme Court teaches that even religious conduct can be regulated for the protection of society. There is no valid argument that the sexual abuse of children is beyond review of civil courts simply because the offending hands and minds are otherwise ordained for the service of God. In crying against civil review of religious entities the editors miss the point that the offending entities have availed themselves of the privileges and benefits of civil incorporation under the laws of the State. Through those incorporations, the entities have chosen to operate under, and be subject to, the civil justice system. Rather than crushing the principle of accountability, the editors should express a bit more faith in the abilities of the members of their readership, local citizens serving as judges and juries, to do what is right in light of available evidence."
*
In my view, if it takes bankrupting many more dioceses to force the Church to finally fully accept responsibility for its misdeeds, then so be it. As has been noted, the problem of cover up and failure to punish high clergy involved goes all the way to the level of the Pope, including the less than saintly John Paul II who some wrongly want to fast track to canonization:
*
As John Cornwell points out with regard to the above, John Paul showed more concern with the effect the scandal has on the church than the effect on the children. He was “afflicted” by the sins of other priests; merely “concerned” for the victims. Priests betrayed their vows of ordination, but there is nothing here about any other betrayals — like trust that a child has for their priest.
*
It can also be noted that John Paul’s analysis of the situation was taken up entirely by a focus on a “bad apples” explanation. Aside from the workings of Satan, all we have are a few bad priests — gay priests primarily, but still just a few bad apples messing things up for everyone else. There is no indication that larger, structural causes are even contemplated, much less in line to be addressed.
*
Pope John Paul II had censored any discussion of what role priestly celibacy may have played in the actions of the accused priests, but not so with homosexuality. Statements from Vatican officials have expressed strong disapproval of the very existence of homosexuals within the priesthood — the presumption being that the sexual abuse problems are caused by gays and that if they disappear, then so will the problems.

Read more...

Archives:

Catholic Church trafficked 14,000 Cuban Children to the US in "Operation Peter Pan"

Australia: Catholic Nuns Drug 150,000 Mothers, Stole Their Babies & Sold in Adoption

666 PROPHECY FULFILLING: “WE WILL LIVE TO SEE THE VATICAN FALL”

As the worst enemy of the Roman Papacy, Dr. Jose Luis De Jesus (The Man Christ Jesus - 666), has arrived to unmask this corrupt religious system, lying priests who disguise themselves and abuse children. “I, the Man Christ Jesus, am going to shut their mouths and unmask every one of them. You will see the Papacy fall. You will see it!”

CNN-Catholic Church Gay Scandal

Help Bring The Pope To Jail for Crimes Against Humanity

Priest Accused of Sexual Assault is HIV Positive

Settlements Reached in sex Abuse Cases in Chicago

Stockton Priest Oliver Francis O'Grady Sued Again

PRIESTS=PEDOPHILIA

PROTECT YOUR CHILDREN FROM PREDATORS

2002 Reuters Report: Catholic Priest Child Sex Abuse Scandal in Boston

Religious Scandal in Milwaukee: Accused Priest to Become Bishop

Local Priest Accused Of Sexual Abuse

Priest Accused of Sexual Abuse

"FATHER " ALBERTO CUTIE CAUGHT IN SCANDAL

Confidential Memo Sent to Archdiocese Very Disturbing

Former Priest Patrick O'Donnell Admits Sexually Abusing Minors

Monterey Diocese Mishandled Sex Abuse Case

  © Sponsored by International Ministry Growing in Grace

Back to TOP